Natalie Allman, 29, has been told by a judge she risks being locked up if she doesn’t update brutal Jason Hughes on their children’s progress.
A mum battered and slashed to within an inch of her life by her jealous ex-fiance has been threatened with jail if she refuses to write to him in prison.
Horrified Natalie Allman, 29, has been ordered by a judge to send letters three times a year to brutal Jason Hughes who tortured her for seven hours in front of their twin sons.
Under parental rights laws, Natalie is being forced to send updates on the five-year-olds along with photos.
The boys were just two when they saw their father batter their mum with his weight-lifting dumbbells, slash her throat with an Army knife and try to suffocate her with a pillow.
If Natalie refuses to write, she will be held in contempt of court and risks being locked up herself.
The devastated mum told the Sunday People: “I feel betrayed that after everything he did his rights mean more than mine – more than my children’s.
“We are the victims, not him. I thought he was going to kill me that night for no reason and my boys saw that. They were terrified.
“I’m so angry that the law still defends his parental rights and that he is still being allowed to control us from behind bars.
“As far as I’m concerned he gave up the right to contact with any of us the night he attacked me but the court doesn’t see it that way.
“What about our rights to get on with our lives and forget the trauma he put us through? As long as we are in constant contact how are we going to do that?”
Natalie ended her relationship with Hughes in February 2012 two months before their planned wedding because of his excessive drinking.
The spurned Territorial Army part-time soldier, who was still staying at their house in Hereford, went berserk one night after discovering she was seeing someone else.
Natalie said: “He’d never been aggressive before, just controlling and he drank too much.
“We’d been separated a few weeks but he was still staying in the house until he found somewhere else.
“He found out that I was seeing someone else and the jealousy just sent him over the edge.
“I woke up in the middle of the night and he was kneeling over me, beating me repeatedly in the face.
“At first I thought he was punching me and then I realised he was using his weights.
“He was smashing them into my face over and over. There was blood everywhere but he didn’t stop.
“It was midnight and then the next thing I knew I was coming round and it was 3am. I don’t know whether I fell asleep or was knocked unconscious.”
Hughes went on to attack Natalie at 3am and again at 6am, tying her up so she couldn’t escape.
The knife wound missed a major artery by millimetres.
Hughes refused to call an ambulance, but at 7am Natalie managed to dial 999 herself. When officers arrived, the couple’s two-year-old twins, Ethan and Timmy, were in bed with their mother and covered in her blood.
Miraculously she survived the attack despite eight wounds to her head and five broken bones in her face.
In August 2012 Hughes was sentenced to nine years at Worcester Crown Court for malicious wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.
His lawyer said: “His intention was to cause a hideous scar she could not hide if she had dressed up to look pretty. He was trying to make her look ugly to other men.”
Natalie began rebuilding her life with her twins, her new partner Wayne Young, 43, and their baby boy Aaron, now two.
But last January she was shocked to receive a letter from Hughes’s lawyer saying he was applying for a Residence and Contact Order under Section 8 of the Children Act of 1989.
Natalie, who needed cosmetic surgery on her throat after the savage attack, said: “I got a letter asking for six letters a year and phone calls on their birthdays and at Christmas.
“I never thought for a second that he would be granted any contact after what he did. I tried not to think about it.
“It seemed so unlikely anyone would take his side over mine.
“But he put the application in and then just before Easter last year I got asked to go to court.”
While Hughes’ expensive lawyers were funded by legal aid Natalie had no representation. She shelled out £3,000 of her savings on solicitors fees to fight the request but shockingly the order was granted.